The Scholarly Kitchen has a post up reporting on a new service which may turn out to be quite significant for libraries. The service allows users to rent access to ejournal articles from several leading publishers (including OUP) for small payments:
Users can sign up for three types of membership:
1. Basic. Pay as you go at $0.99 per article for a 24-hour rental
2. Silver. A monthly subscription plan at $9.99 , which allows 20 articles at any one time with a 7-day rental, and
3. Gold. A subscription plan of $19.99 allows unlimited rentals with no rental period
Reading further down you come across this quote which contains a rather alarming description of libraries as “information silos”:
Still, others like Geoff Bilder of CrossRef have been promoting the idea of an iPubs service for some time as a way of dismantling the information silos built by publishers and libraries.
This links to an article describing the use of Mendeley, an increasingly popular site for collaboration as a recommendation engine for scientific papers. The idea is that Mendeley could function as the perfect discovery tool for such a service, completely cutting libraries out of the picture. In other words, what we may be witnessing are the creation of Web 2.0 services that both find articles for users, and then provide them with easy ways to get the content through micropayments. Google Books would be the obvious way to provide such a service for ebooks.
How many years will it be before we start to hear administrators speculate that they could better spend library budgets by shutting down libraries and giving faculty and students a certain amount of money each year to simply rent what they need? If you think this kind of scenario is alarmest read this recent article on a talk given by a Univeristy of California assistant provost on the future of libraries. There are obvious counter arguments to be made on the real value that libraries and information professionals provide universities, but in times of shrinking budgets they may seem less than persuasive.